Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Opinions are divided on whether museums should be used to entertain people or give people educational values. While I understand the logic behind the former view, I am still in favor of the latter.

Those who believe that museums should be enjoyable places may point to the conservation of these. It is clear that museums will be more attractive if they can make people pleasant. This leads to more income for the museums and they will have the ability to conserve and rebuild their facility. However, this can be helped by local governments. For example, the governments can subsidize the local museums by using money from the state treasury or call local people to raise funds.

Nevertheless, I am in favor of using museums for educational purposes partly because of their historical values and partly because of their cultural features. Regarding the former, museums have always been the place to give people lessons about history. They help people recall or remember what our nation has gone through and arouse patriotism which makes a nation stronger. As far as the second idea is concerned, museums can be used as a method of cultural promotion. This will attract many foreign tourists which increase revenues for local tourism and also the museums.

In conclusion, I believe that using museums to convey valuable lessons, although causing fewer revenues that can support the conservation of the museums, is historically and culturally significant. As such, I think this practice should be allowed for the time being.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-24 buiquan 78 view
2024-05-20 Tường Vân 89 view
2022-10-29 Charles Le 78 view
2022-09-14 linhdung01 73 view
2022-08-10 Hanabi 87 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, still, while, for example, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63152883321 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9813585522 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7857142857 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343128882489 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123725784352 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108581509914 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226729144966 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932778689747 0.056905535591 164% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.