Some people believe that the use of mobile phones in public should be banned.
Do you agree or disagree?
In contemporary society, it is generally believed that using mobile phones in public places should be prohibited as it brings certain impacts to society in general and individuals in particular. Personally, I hold a firm belief that it is essential to ban the use of mobile devices in public.
For a variety of reasons, smart phones should be banned in certain areas. To begin with, public places such as hospitals should be kept peaceful as patients need quality time to optimize their recovery. Hence, when people use their phones regardless of whatever purposes, especially making phone calls, this may destroy the tranquil atmosphere, which must be maintained all the time, in hospitals. Moreover, cell phones must not be used in petrol stations. This is because when people turn on their cell phones, phone signals may interrupt, causing technical error in petrol pumps, which are mainly operated by using technological chips. Therefore, such errors might cause unexpected catastrophe such as explosion.
Apart from the abovementioned practical concerns, cell phone prohibition is necessary in public. One of the greatest reasons is that stopping people from using their personal phones can reduce the traffic accident rate. Due to the fact that mobile phones often distract transport users, using cell phones while driving can lead to tragic accidents as commuters might lose their sight, hitting objects in front of their vehicles. In addition, using smart phones while riding motorbike can attract snatchers. For instance, in third-world countries, bikers’ phones are often snatched if they use their phones without being cautious. As a result, prohibiting the use of mobile devices can partially help alleviate crime, especially in underdeveloped countries.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that it is vital to ban smart phones in some places such as hospitals, gas stations or when commuters driving their transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-09 | trikhung777 | 92 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | deolkuljeet1991 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | deolkuljeet1991 | 11 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | deolkuljeet1991 | 67 | view |
- Some people believe men are competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits What are the problems of being famous Do you think being famous is good or bad 56
- The diagram illustrates the process of lithography a method used for printing newspapers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where necessary Write at least 150 words 86
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their friends and families Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- In many countries people do not recycle waste materials such as paper glass and cans What are the reasons for this What could be done to solve this problem 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, third, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50328947368 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81878337823 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0158197196 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351055478859 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128386766566 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614566017365 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217672509479 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844207859626 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, third, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, in general, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50328947368 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81878337823 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0158197196 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.533333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351055478859 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128386766566 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614566017365 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217672509479 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844207859626 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.