The media should limit how much bad news they report because it discourages people from doing activities which usually involve very little risk.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary society, it is believed that there should be a limitation in bad news report as it stops people from engaging in certain activities, some of which are even risk-free. Personally, I totally disagree with the fact that negative news should be strictly controlled as readers will not be discouraged by reading it.
For a variety of reasons, it would be ineffective to control news report about negative information. To begin with, people deserve to know, whether the information is positive or negative, about the situations occurring around them on a daily basis. Hence, once they are aware of their surroundings, they can be more cautious and well-prepared for any dangers. For instance, when a crime takes place in a neighbourhood, if the local media does not report about it, local residents will not be able to prepare a plan to protect themselves as well as their own properties. Consequently, the circumstance might somehow deteriorate and this may cause more unexpected incidents.
Apart from the abovementioned practical concerns, bad news only brings certain minor impacts on people, particularly when it comes to doing harmless activities. This is because the majority of readers in the modern era are educated. Thus, when selecting information for their reading, these groups of readers have a tendency filter out unnecessary information or search for various sources before making their final decision. To elaborate, consuming high-calorie food, such as fast food, is considered one of the main roots of numerous diseases, including cardiovascular disease. Some health-conscious individuals find this information incorrect as if they maintain an appropriate amount of calorie intake, they can still stay healthy and even lose fat.
Taking everything into consideration, this reinforces my perspective that strictly controlling bad news is unnecessary as negative information cannot stop people from taking part in less harmful activities in their daily life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-17 | trikhung777 | 84 | view |
| 2021-04-18 | Trinh Phuong | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-20 | Kha Nguyen | 83 | view |
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 80
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- In many countries people do not recycle waste materials such as paper glass and cans What are the reasons for this What could be done to solve this problem 73
- The sale and use of hard drugs are prohibited in many countries but tobacco and alcohol are sold and consumed Governments should apply laws that prohibit the sale and use of hard drugs to all drugs including tobacco and alcohol What is your opinion 89
- Animal habitats have been destroyed and some animal species e g the tiger and the rhino have become endangered Why does this happen What can be done to protect endangered animals 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'disagree that'.
Suggestion: disagree that
...e even risk-free. Personally, I totally disagree with the fact that negative news should be strictly contro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, may, so, still, thus, well, apart from, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49350649351 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15928277203 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3866817277 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.153846154 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183265590902 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605308954322 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619574994564 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114589082531 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606909185561 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.