Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more
money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic
teams.
Who can deny the importance of art in society? As we all know, art is one of the most important parts of everyone's life. All of us spend a great deal of our time on matters that directly relate to art. In similar importance, most of the people love that their country becomes successful in the Olympic games or the host of that event. However, I, personally, believe that the importance of art is more important than athletics events for investment. I will explain my view for two reasons.
First, art is one of the most significant factors in the development of a country, and spending money on art plays a vital role in the development of the cultural, social, and economic of a country. Nowadays, because of the industrial developments, human beings' lives are so easier than at any time in the history of humans. People have become so rich, so they are always seeking ways for finding new places and new entertainment. As a result, investing in the issues related to art has much income for a country. For example, Turkey, which does not have sufficient natural resources, by expanding arts, such as music and architecture, is the host of many people as a tourist from all over the world. Thus, investing in art has so stable benefits for them.
Second, investing in art brings about the growth of culture in that country. In the countries where governments spend a great deal of money on art, typically, their people more notice the issues such as ethical values. The conflicts among people are so few, people have more welfare than other countries. In addition, we should not conceal the importance of athletics. The existence of powerful teams increases the nation's national pride. For example, the US is one of the pioneers of the Olympic games. This country by means of its abilities has managed to reach the top level of sports. It has caused them to become the most well-known country in terms of sport in the world. However, in my opinion, the importance of art outweighs the benefits of athletics.
In conclusion, all the aforementioned reasons, lead us to the conclusion that investing in art has two crucial fruits. The first one is that art brings economic prosperity to a country. The second one is that art increases the cultural and ethical values in a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Take | 70 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | slliland | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | waliwaliwa | 85 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | redark777 | 75 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | Ruuluu9073 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 73
- Question It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing it is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with that idea 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73618090452 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71421102558 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489949748744 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1155473139 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5416666667 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153009477353 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440131983263 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388790715595 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980018870389 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361338105151 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.