the bar chart below shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons
The chart illustrates the points of three teams which are scored in seasons 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005.
Overall, the point of team B was the highest over four years, the opposite was true for the scores from teams A and C. While the score by team A was always lower than team B, in the last two years team A had the points higher than team C.
In 2002, team B had 82 points which was the highest score of the three teams, while the score of team C was 10 points and the point of team A was less than two times of team C. There was a slight increase in the scores of team A and C, respectively 11 and 15 points. By contrast, the year 2003 witnessed a marginal decrease of 22 in the point of team B.
In 2004, the point of team A was higher than the point’s team C, respectively 35 and 12 points. Meanwhile, the point of team B saw a slow fall to 43 before experiencing a steady growth of 12 in 2005. At the same time, the figures for teams A and C went down considerably below 10 points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-01 | tunganhle388@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | tata | view | |
| 2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | 90 | view |
| 2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | view | |
| 2022-05-01 | kaylin ng | 67 | view |
- the bar chart below shows the scores of teams A B and C over four different seasons 67
- The chart below shows the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 67
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local businesses are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of the local business will bring about the death of the local communities To what extent do y 56
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoid changing Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 799.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.01507537688 4.92477711251 82% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24234371827 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447236180905 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.0 1.45097560976 69% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.4789690598 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7777777778 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258063737382 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133189130901 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637349190364 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189503522258 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496088650447 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 99.91 61.2550243902 163% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.04 11.4140731707 53% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 5.0 11.0658536585 45% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.