The chart below shows the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013

The bar chart compares the worldwide sales of Samsung, Apple, Nokia, LG, and ZTE in three different years.

Overall, Samsung and Nokia were the two brands with the highest global cell phone sales in 2009, 2011, and 2013. In contrast, the sales worldwide sales of ZTE were the lowest of the five brands.

In 2009, Nokia had the highest sales of cell phones around the world, at just under 450 [, while the second highest belonged to Samsung with global sales of 225. Over the four years, there was a significant decrease in the global sales of Nokia, down to 250. In comparison, Samsung witnessed a dramatic increase to 450 in its worldwide sales of mobile phone and had the highest sales in 2013 compared with other brands.

Meanwhile, the global sales of Apple in 2009 were the lowest at 25, but later went up sharply by 125 in 2013. ZTE and LG had initial sales figures of 50 and 120 respectively. However, the year 2013 saw a gradual decline of 40 in the sales of LG cell phones around the world, while ZTE experienced a slight rise to just over 50.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-21 PhucHuynh 100 view
2023-03-02 Giang Tran 67 view
2023-02-17 tieuquynh 84 view
2023-01-12 AYUSH BOTHRA 73 view
2022-11-09 BÙI QUỐC VƯƠNG 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: ']' seems to be missing
...nes around the world, at just under 450 [, while the second highest belonged to S...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56544502618 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25440829728 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497382198953 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9140294302 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302397103259 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14054178489 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639905949696 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194706640825 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773278128951 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.