The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day.
?Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. (The photo is in the next post.)
The two pictures compare the previous map of a university campus in 2010 and the current layout of this place.
It is crystal clear that although some pivotal routes remained the same during this period, various developments have been made in buildings and facilities.
The most significant change can be seen in student accommodation. Firstly, while the main complex for the student residence in the upper right of the map remained unchanged, new housing was also constructed just beside it. Moreover, the sporadic stores and the restaurant are destroyed completely, and new apartments for students have been built in their place. Instead, the old apartment complex on the left side of the lake is replaced with a modern building including not only numerous facilities for students but also some offices and shops.
In the central part of the map, the leisure area around the lake has been expanded. The small blocks for holding classrooms about science and art are also extended and separated, which means two buildings just in front of each other have been constructed. One of them is used for teaching science, while in another one, students can learn about art.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-11 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | kamelelahe | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-30 | trasher kubarev | view | |
| 2021-09-06 | viviene | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-20 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
- Two maps show the change of a coastal town called Pentland from 1950 to 2007 95
- The two maps below show an island before and after construction of some tourist facilities
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant The photo is in the next post 78
- Some people think that employers should not be concerned about how employees dress at work but the quality of work only To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people think that employers should not be concerned about how employees dress at work but the quality of work only To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0725388601 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60908483698 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642487046632 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5586765311 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110158478424 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478875792161 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417861576649 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782999498806 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337338358948 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.