the chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966.
The vertical bar graph illustrates the data of age when the Australian women delivered their first child in three distinctive years such as 1966, 1986 and 2006. Units are measured in percentage.
Overall, only minimum women are giving birth to their first child after 40 years old over the given years. Whereas, women with 30 to 34 years old birth data has increasing considerably compared to other age group with the given years.
As is observed, in the beginning majority of women giving birth to their first child in 19 to 24 years old with more than 62% which is 30% higher than in 1986 with around 35% and the data reduced to below 30% by 2006. Similarly, under 19 years old women percentage of first child data also declined over the years which was about 35% in 1986 while the rate was a mere 12% by 2006.
However, the womens first delivery age was increased from 30 to 34 years over the given years which was approximately 12% in 1966 and it climbed to over 35% by 2006. Likewise, 34 to 39 years also escalated which is below 10% in 1966 and around 18% and 30% in the year 1986 and 2006 respectively. Moreover, above 40 years birth rate was only belo10% all the given years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | baoquyen1906 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-02 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- the chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 67
- some people argue that regular games have more benefits for young people than modern ones to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- the graph below shows the number of houses constructed in particular part of the UK and also shows prediction of 2020 66
- the bar chart shows global sales in billion dollars of various types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 67
- there is no compelling reason to go to different places to learn about other peoples different societies we can learn so much from books films and the internet can be used as a source of data on various societies do you agree or disagree to this idea 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...fter 40 years old over the given years. Whereas, women with 30 to 34 years old birth da...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 30% higher than in 1986 with around 35% and the data reduced to below 30% by 200...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, likewise, moreover, similarly, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49769585253 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29357945144 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465437788018 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7858839625 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.444444444 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240211800547 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117165149518 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798961857386 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177348710059 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045117563119 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.