Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some believe that spending money on improvisation of technology to explore space would be non-beneficial because there are many other facts which need more money. Technological developments are inevitable and arranging money for science and research functions is also crucial. This essay disagrees with the statement and intends to explain it in detail.
On the one hand, people who think money should divert to other divisions because technology or space exploration alone could not help the common people's basic needs. In other words, the government should spend money on people's highly needs including shelter, food education and so on. Similarly, ongoing space exploration would not provide for their daily needs in the long run. These technologies would be beneficial only for the development of air space categories and the expense are overwhelming compared to other common factors.
On the other hand, there are many benefits of the space exploration and advancing technological development in humans life. Initially, advanced technology used for space exploration directly linked to many discoveries which is used for the peoples daily life. For instance, air condition and wireless connections are able to develop when the scientists thinks on the communication technology needed for space travel. Secondly government can earn money wisely in other ways such as proper enhancement of agriculture, utilization of local products and economy and so on.
In addition, urbanization and over population would be a devastating stages recently, owing to the fact that space exploration would helps the people to live in other planet like earth itself.
To sum up, even though space exploration would be a costly matter of choice, the advantageous of such technological improvement helps the people in other greatest level. Therefore these expense are never be a loose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- personal satisfaction is declining in large urban communities what can be the explanation behind this what significant progress can be made to determine this issue 73
- Some people think the money spent on developing technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- some people argue that regular games have more benefits for young people than modern ones to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- some people believe that government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Other think that building more wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
- the bar chart shows global sales in billion dollars of various types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 134, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...o the fact that space exploration would helps the people to live in other planet like...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 171, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lps the people in other greatest level. Therefore these expense are never be a loose.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 205, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...evel. Therefore these expense are never be a loose.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50519031142 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96444288199 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9604718573 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361997949235 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130950893419 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714533118355 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204745433604 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113771960323 0.056905535591 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 134, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...o the fact that space exploration would helps the people to live in other planet like...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 171, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...lps the people in other greatest level. Therefore these expense are never be a loose.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 205, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...evel. Therefore these expense are never be a loose.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50519031142 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96444288199 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557093425606 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9604718573 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361997949235 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130950893419 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714533118355 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204745433604 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113771960323 0.056905535591 200% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.