Professor show on television.
The reading and the listening passage talk about the pros and cons of professors being on a television show. The writer mentions a few benefits related to the topic while the speaker in the listening passage disagrees with the author's statement. She doubts whether anyone will really get the benefit when professors choose to come on T.V.
First, the author mentions that when professors perform on the television show then they get popular among the people outside the campus. The speaker opposes the claim. She says that by such shows, professors, who choose to do their show on T.V., are not considered serious by their colleagues. According to the speaker, it is not considered good with respect to the professional standpoint.
Also, the author notes that universities reputation will also increase when people acknowledge their faculty members. Additionally, it will also help to get funds for the university projects and research topics. The lecturer denies the argument. She claims that when professors indulge in doing extra shows, they get busy with rehearsing for it and also doing other additional work such as traveling and so on. Due to this, professors are not able to pay attention to their academic work i.e. research, attending university events, and giving time to their students.
Lastly, the author states that professors' ideas will be shared among other people. Moreover, people, who are not able to reach directly to professors, can learn through their on-screen recording. The lecturer refutes the author's statement. She argues that all television programs are not about the research work of professors. They only invite them to talk about a particular article that is not research-based.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 75 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | nilav | 71 | view |
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree 50
- R robustus as a hunter 68
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mam mal known as Repenomomus robustus R robustus Interestingly the mammal s stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur Some researchers have therefore suggested that R rob 66
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...he listening passage disagrees with the authors statement. She doubts whether anyone wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...tandpoint. Also, the author notes that universities reputation will also increase when peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Additionally, it will also help to get funds for the university projects and re...
^^
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...een recording. The lecturer refutes the authors statement. She argues that all televisi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, lastly, moreover, really, so, then, while, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24727272727 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71889622719 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.7430899724 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1875 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241011253232 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701761349164 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113411572617 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163269642199 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854385106751 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.