The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012
The given diagram illustrates how Happy Valley Shopping Center changed from 1982 to 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the shopping center witnessed significant development. Most noticeably, the addition of some facilities and the relocation of some stores.
In 1982, there was an entertainment area in the middle of a shopping center. Meanwhile, in the east, there were three stores namely a sports store, electronics store, and furniture store. Besides, there is an elevator (to the 2nd floor) in the south and toilets in the south-west. Next, in the north, there is a food store and in the north-west, there is a coffee shop. There is a lobby next to the entrance on the west and there is a path. On the outside, there is a lake and many trees surrounding the shopping center.
In 2012, sports store and electronics store were moved to the north. Meanwhile, food stores were moved, and the addition of new themed restaurants in the east. Moreover, a lobby area is removed and the entrance was in the shopping center. And the entertainment area, toilets, and elevator (to the 2nd floor) remained unchanged. On the outside, the lake was replaced by furniture retails in the east and the path is replaced by a parking lot in the south-west.
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
- The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 67
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 78
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 213.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82159624413 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77316595714 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 176.041082164 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460093896714 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.7434793758 49.4020404114 32% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.3571428571 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2142857143 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161229474888 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640341787233 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119816668981 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157472680391 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183154378349 0.056905535591 322% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.