The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 summarize the information by selecting main features etc

The provided pictures illustrate the transformation of a small local museum with the introduction of several amenities in 1957 and 2007.
Overall, this area underwent a number of dramatic changes, the most important of which are the rearrangement of the museum’s area and the decrease in tree numbers in the garden.
Looking first at the main building itself, there were new special exhibitions and an education center added in the north of the museum center, which was accompanied by the demolition of the national history exhibition in that place. The year 2007 experienced the relocation and expansion of the local history room from the left corner to the center. Also, a museum shop in tandem with a new cafe were constructed catering for the recreational purposes of visitors, taking up all of the land previously used for the museum storage.
Turning to the outside of the area, there were several changes made to facilitate the construction of odd areas. More trees in the woodland were cleared so in 2007, the area surrounding the local history place planted fewer trees. Another change is that the route leading to the entrance hall was completely demolished. In the bottom right-hand corner, a new parking lot was erected for easier car management.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ictures illustrate the transformation of a small local museum with the introducti...
^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ational purposes of visitors, taking up all of the land previously used for the museum sto...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08653846154 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82801849525 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610576923077 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6762628468 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.555555556 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144292928936 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587058483003 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647921777559 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968509933864 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703715453261 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.