Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most
compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Students’ academic performance is contingent on several factors which subsume students abilities to comprehend what is being taught and teacher’s dexterity and effectiveness. However, basing a pedagogue’s salary on the grades of students is unjustifiable as it is hard to determine if the student’s performance was as a result of the teacher’s teaching or some other factors. Hence, pupils’ academic performance should not be used to justify teachers’ remuneration but to determine teacher’s efficacy.
Using pupils’ academic performances to determine pedant’s salaries might spur the teacher to lower the grading standards, thereby making students score higher marks. Evidently, this does not improve the student’s performance. Rather, the teacher, whose salaries is based on student’s performance, would receive tremendous increase in remuneration. Although, this is beneficial to teacher, it is highly detrimental on the student and on the society at large as educational institution will begin to churn out incompetent professionals.
Apart from teachers being incited to reducing marking standards, teachers will also increase point marks that are awarded to questions. Through this, we will begin to see extraneous marks awarded to trivial questions in students exams. The upshot of this is that students will get higher marks and these students will be largely unable to solve complex questions. In addition, these students will not develop the critical thinking skills required to take on real life challenges. Hence, the true essence of education, which is to beget true competent dabs, will not be served.
Some reasonable individuals might cavil that teachers whose students are not performing up to expectation, should not receive quality remuneration since it is clear from the students’ performance that the teacher is a chump. This is true to some extent. But we need to consider other factors that must have led to the students’ poor performance such as motivation to learn, availability of conducive learning facilities, and mental capacity to learn. The teacher might be virtuos at his occupation but with these factors serving as impediments to the pedagogue’s exertions, the students’ performance will surely reflect poorly on the teacher’s efforts.
In conclusion, student’s educational performance is dependent on several factors, part of which include teacher’s efficiency. It is totally absurd to then say because of this, the society should base teacher’s renumeration on pupils’ performance. Other causes might have led students to perform poorly or brilliantly. Therefore, a teachers’ salary should not be based on student’s performance but their level in the echelon of teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
- Several recent studies have shown a link between health and stair usage One recently completed study shows that people who live in stairs only apartment buildings that is buildings without elevators live an average of three years longer than do people who 80
- The following appeared in an article in the Grandview Beacon For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony Last year however private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the 70
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 62
- According to an independent poll of 200 charitable organizations overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year but educational institutions did not fare as well as other organizations Donations to international aid groups increased th 58
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine Two studies of amphibians in Xanadu National Park confirm a significant decline in the numbers of amphibians In 1975 there were seven species of amphibians in the park and there were abu 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76283618582 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21433979544 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501222493888 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4553204246 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.85 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284662840023 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103984259453 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663091420286 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188370510738 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618157642498 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.1639044944 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.