In some countries, more and more adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
A heated debate has been aroused these days about whether it is beneficial for graduates to keep staying under the same roof with their parents or not. From my personal standpoint, I would adhere that the merits of this tendency would eclipsed it demerits.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that finance will be no longer a burden to youngsters given their continuing residing with parents. In this era of price escalation, the cost of living alone would be a major hurdle for fresh graduates and novice workers, whose incomes are unstable and little in comparison with the enormous amount of monthly expenditures on house price, utility bills, necessity costs, to name a few. Besides, by living under the same roof, not only parents and children are given the opportunity to strengthen the bonds between them, but parents also have the chance to hands down invaluable experience to their coming-of-age offsprings, which would give them a considerable assistance when having to deal with multifaceted adult life. In a recent research, scientists has figured out that those living together with their family up to the age of 30 will have more achievements in life compared to those who do not.
On the other hand, it is worth mentioned that there are still existed drawbacks in view of this tendency. We are all acknowledged that offsprings, if being overprotective, will be reliant on their parents in every aspects of their lives. These dependent and pampered grownups will be deficient in autonomy and self-sufficiency, which make them fall behind with their counterparts. In the long run, once they are no longer being taken under their parents’ wings, they will easily fall victim to social misconducts and be devastated in this complicated world.
All in all, despite the aforementioned disadvantages of this trend, I still hold the belief that the benefits of graduates not flying out of their nest would overshadow its negative side.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 11
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and who should takes responsibility 89
- Nowadays people spend more and more time away from their family Why What effect will it have on themselves and their family 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'eclipse'
Suggestion: eclipse
... that the merits of this tendency would eclipsed it demerits. On the one hand, it is...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08411214953 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85926327865 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601246105919 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5261411091 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.363636364 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195949947094 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692315448721 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494884026447 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998199437927 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617352701674 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.