Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These day, one of the most debatable issues in our society is whether foreigners who travel to a nation should be charged more than their domestic travelers. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this notion and I will explain my opinion in this essay.
First and foremost, regardless of foreigners or native people, they are all visitors who have an interest in the culture and history of a specific destination. There is no evidence that travelers from other countries are receiving the better treatment than those who from different parts of a nation. In fact, foreigners have already paid extra for the commuting price when most of them have to take a plane in order to arrive in another country and go back after this trip. Therefore, charging them more price is unreasonable.
In addition, the national image can deteriorate after this action. Visitors who have other nationalities will undoubtedly recognize the discrimination in fees. With the occurring globalization, this conduct can cause consequences for the whole reputation of a country. To exemplify, a local resident in Vietnam used to be exposed by the distinct prices for each type of holiday-maker. They charged a group of foreign visitors for a trial of traditional costumes five times the normal price. This implementation sparked outrage across the country, causing the national reputation to suffer.
In conclusion, irrespective of nationality, it is crucial for the local residents to show the same respect to visitors who commute a long way to their area. Visitors begin their journey with optimism and should conclude it with contentment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-02 | quang1944 | 73 | view |
2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 78 | view |
2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 61 | view |
2022-07-19 | qaengx12 | 73 | view |
2022-03-25 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend more time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 49
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What types of changes are occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 89
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both vie 73
- Obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries Explain the main cause and solutions of this problem 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'These days'?
Suggestion: This day; These days
These day, one of the most debatable issues in ou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l explain my opinion in this essay. First and foremost, regardless of foreig...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng them more price is unreasonable. In addition, the national image can dete...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the national reputation to suffer. In conclusion, irrespective of nationali...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22519083969 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00290489277 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606870229008 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7822923941 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7857142857 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277958201254 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885787379912 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459672115167 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166988727187 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279707404428 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'These days'?
Suggestion: This day; These days
These day, one of the most debatable issues in ou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l explain my opinion in this essay. First and foremost, regardless of foreig...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng them more price is unreasonable. In addition, the national image can dete...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the national reputation to suffer. In conclusion, irrespective of nationali...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22519083969 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00290489277 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606870229008 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7822923941 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7857142857 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277958201254 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885787379912 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459672115167 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166988727187 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279707404428 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.