Every day, millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world. Why do you think this is happening? And how can we solve this problem?
These days, the problem of wasting a large amount of food is happening across the world. There is a reason behind this phenomenon and an appropriate solution should be adopted by the government and citizens to improve the situation.
This issue can be explained by food that is not used up in the meal will be thrown in the trash while it is still edible instead of preserved. This is because of the cheap price of food make human tend to buy fresh ingredients without feeling the need to turn leftovers into the next meal. This is perfectly exemplified in the case of 1/3 of the food thrown away each day is leftovers from families. And the surplus supply of food is also the cause of this issue. With higher crops, food is produced more than the amount that the whole population could possibly eat. This is mainly due to the expiration of deterioration of the food and they need to be destroyed because it is no longer usable. This can be seen in the case of all the food that can not be sold out at the supermarket will be destroyed at the end of the day.
However, there are various steps that governments and citizens could take to tackle these problems. This could be carried out by campaigns to raise public awareness with the aim of changing public attitudes to food consumption. The deleterious effects of food waste on the environment should be highlighted. This raised concern of the problem would lead people to understand the seriousness of harm by throwing food products away. Governments can also adopt taxing the food industry to ameliorate this situation. Therefore, this solution may discourage people from buying or ordering more than they actually need.
In conclusion, this phenomenon can be explained by food wastage from daily life, left overs that can not be consumed. And viable step needs to be taken by government and citizens to tackle this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | nguyenkhangtriem | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | nguyenkhangtriem | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | mytinh | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | giangngoc | 82 | view |
- anyone can use mobile phone to answer the work or make personal call at any time of 7 days a week Does this development have positive or negative effect on both individuals and society 56
- Today family members do not eat meals together Why Is this a positive or a negative trend 11
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 56
- Nowadays some parents put a lot of pressure on their children What is the reason for doing that Is this a positive or negative development for the children 56
- Some people say that men are naturally more competitive than women What extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d to turn leftovers into the next meal. This is perfectly exemplified in the case of...
^^^^
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...an the amount that the whole population could possibly eat. This is mainly due to the expirati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74085365854 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61482120452 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509146341463 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2408617248 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.4705882353 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281204301677 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105616728272 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051406886685 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191572715556 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142035236823 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.