The governments should give each citizen a basic income so that they have enough money to live on, even if they are unemployed.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it is not uncommon to see the national administrations continually providing a guarantee of a basic life standard for all residents without any dedication to the economy. In my opinion, i totally have an opposite view to this phenomenon because of some following justifications.
First and foremost, there is no doubt that various fundamental matters should be totally or partially covered by the public funds, such as public transportation systems or health services, meanwhile providence of monthly basic earnings without taking part in the workforce should not be included. It is true that unemployed people are more likely to lean toward others, or even the government, and this will lead to the economy being negatively affected. Consequently, the public funds spent on non-employee can be referred as a heavy burden of the society. Take the workforce of The United States of America as a prime example, instead of contributing to the economy as a legal worker, unemployed Americans would opt for paying their bills by the financial aids of the society if they could not get a well-paid job.
On top of that, national resources are definitely countable. As a result, there might be not any nations taking care all their residents with basic earnings in years to come. Despite covering fundamentally financial demands on their individuals, the government should significantly put emphasis on raising awareness of the advantages of working, contributing to the society for their locals.
Eventually, i undoubtedly agree with the opinion that people ought to make their all living by themselves. Beside that, the nations should only spend the public funds on the public matters such as infrastructure, health services, educational systems or disabled individuals
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-30 | Ashish-Sharma | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | Ashish-Sharma | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | Ashish-Sharma | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-30 | Ashish-Sharma | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | trangia | 73 | view |
- Today the internet and TV have created chance for ordinary people to become famous Is it a positive or negative development 61
- The governments should give each citizen a basic income so that they have enough money to live on even if they are unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The governments should give each citizen a basic income so that they have enough money to live on even if they are unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The governments should give each citizen a basic income so that they have enough money to live on even if they are unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, well, while, no doubt, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1154977982 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.3993116883 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.363636364 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10429209595 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347111569228 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214211733573 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569135035522 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177640486547 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.