The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010.
Given are the two maps depicting the modifications of an undetermined room for trade discussion in two distinct years in the past, 2009 and 2010.
It is conspicuous that the layout of the meeting conference is more likely to undergo several changes with the addition and relocation of some items to satisfy human needs.
In the uppermost part of the plan, the main entrance, a registration, and a side entrance remained their original locations during the time frame. Furthermore, a balcony stayed in the same place at the bottom left-hand corner but a new lounge area was added in this in 2010.
Perceptibly, the most significant swings between the two plans were the disappearance of three display areas in the heart of the map and a novel registration was built above the concert hall adjacent to the balcony which was an exhibition area in 2009. Besides, a stage and some seats were put in the concert hall. Additionally, a concert hall and meeting room with a number of seats inside at the bottom right-hand was converted into a big exhibition area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | songuyen14 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anne020304 | 11 | view |
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 78
- Some people say that devoting one s time to family activities is more important than spending time working Others believe that dedicating one s time to work is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- how sugar is produced from sugar cane 100
- The Two Pie Charts Below Show Some Employment Patterns in Great Britain in 1992 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps depicting the modification...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91160220994 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83780054477 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60773480663 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6978294097 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130541642592 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527052034212 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528715954038 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782020048236 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496777302645 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.