Q8 As countries develop more and more people buy and use their own cars Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment.
Recently, an increase in the number of personal vehicles has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that although there are some disadvantages to a rise in the number of private vehicle users for the environment, these are outweighed by the advantages for human beings, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that a growth in car ownership exerts poses a threat to the environment do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that a huge amount of CO2 emitted by cars exerts a detrimental influence on the quality of air. In other words, air pollution stemming from an excessive quantity of carbon dioxide can lead people to suffer from a multitude of diseases causing damage to their well-being and mental health. In addition, an astronomical amount of CO2 released by cars can accelerate the speed of global warming that gives rise to global warming, which can prevent people from having an improved standard of living.
My opinion, however, is that mankind can benefit a great deal from the use of private vehicles. Perhaps the principal advantage is that owning a car facilitates various aspects of individuals' daily lives from commuting to and from their workplaces to purchasing groceries. To be more specific, car users are able to travel to and from work with greater ease, compared to employees using public transport given that passengers of buses and metros are generally too crowded and sometimes unavailability. Another benefit is that car users are capable of taking trips conveniently because they do not need to worry about problems related to public transport, such as being fixed limited routes and timetables, which enables them to relish their journeys more. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the benefits of making use of cars for humans surpass the drawbacks for the environment for the reasons discussed above.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
2022-08-03 | hellielts | 89 | view |
2022-06-23 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
2021-10-24 | minhquanvn | 78 | view |
- Some people believe famous people s support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems while others think celebrities make the problems less important Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Q15 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe famous people s support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems while others think celebrities make the problems less important Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Q5 It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q12 The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalization produces positive effects for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 810, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he above, I find these more persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that the...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10540540541 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77879505762 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597297297297 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.151071698 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.933333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274132952559 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742078938792 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634264376708 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151029856778 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409702109831 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.