Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
The number of companies produce goods containing high amounts of sugar, which lead to numerous health issues. Many people believe that if sugar- based products should be made more expensive, individuals will consume less than before. Personally, I strongly disagree with this idea due to some reasons which will be discussed in this essay.
To begin with, the costs of sugary foods and drinks are risen which lead to the decrease in the number of consumption. As a result, this actions have negative effects on companies which manufacture sugar-based products, which causes the fact that these firms may be sell sugar- based products illegally with cheaper prices to people who addictive to sugar since this method could help them to remain their profits. This process could be rise pressure on government policies to investigate and dismantle more numerous illegal business than before.
At the same time, because sugary products such as bread and milk occurs in people’s diet every day at present. If government increases the price of these products, it will make more people would not able to afford them. Therefore, numerous individuals could bear nutrient deficiency, which increases medical care expense on both government and citizens.
In conclusion, I would disagree that rising the costs of products containing high amounts of sugar to support individuals to eat less sugar because this action affects adversely companies which manufacture sugary foods and drinks; and it is tough for poor people afford important sugary products such as bread or milk. Instead, there should be more programs and posters that educate on healthy eating and the health risks associated with the excessive consumption of sugar- rich food and drinks intake.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich will be discussed in this essay. To begin with, the costs of sugary foods...
^^^^
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...the number of consumption. As a result, this actions have negative effects on compan...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umerous illegal business than before. At the same time, because sugary product...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pense on both government and citizens. In conclusion, I would disagree that ris...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32374100719 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54888542994 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571942446043 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.2357226658 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.545454545 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436474517289 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153171994883 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111619381289 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265899165937 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103426611236 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.