The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
The pie chart illustrates the results of conducted surveys in one African nation asking young people the major reasons for usage their phones over the period shown.
As can be seen from the chart, it is clear that whereas the proportions of the teenagers using their phone for phone calls and digital camera witneesed an upward trend, the opposite was true for social networds and email. The teenagers using their phone for social networks account for the greatest percentage.
In 2016, the percentage of children utilizing their phone for social networks reached a peak of exactly 50%, compared to 25% for email. the figure for young people using their phone for digital camera was 5% higher than making phone calls, registering 15% and 10% , respectively.
By 2019, there was a slight decreased in the percentage of teenagers using their phone for social networks, with by 2% from 2016 to 2017, after which this figure rose marginally to 56% in 2019. Similarly, the percentage of teenagers using their phone for digital camera climbed slowly to 20% in 2019.In contrast, the proportion of young people usage their phone for email declined slightly to 19% in 2019. There was a gradual increase in the figure for using phones , at 13% in 2017, after which this figure reduced dramatically to 5% in 2017.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Phạm Gia Bảo | view | |
| 2023-08-02 | taman150507 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | drikbest | 67 | view |
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 78
- Some people think parents should read or tell stories to children Others think parents needn t do that as children can read books or watch TV movies by themselves Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 73
- there are more worker working from home and more students studying from home This is because computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper 67
- The bar shows the precentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...exactly 50%, compared to 25% for email. the figure for young people using their pho...
^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing phone calls, registering 15% and 10% , respectively. By 2019, there was a sli...
^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...al camera climbed slowly to 20% in 2019.In contrast, the proportion of young peopl...
^^
Line 4, column 465, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... increase in the figure for using phones , at 13% in 2017, after which this figure...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95433789954 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44296124039 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525114155251 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8867520823 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.625 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413610952448 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214481215064 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737329976505 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276670120527 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468006978341 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...exactly 50%, compared to 25% for email. the figure for young people using their pho...
^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing phone calls, registering 15% and 10% , respectively. By 2019, there was a sli...
^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...al camera climbed slowly to 20% in 2019.In contrast, the proportion of young peopl...
^^
Line 4, column 465, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... increase in the figure for using phones , at 13% in 2017, after which this figure...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95433789954 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44296124039 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525114155251 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8867520823 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.625 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413610952448 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214481215064 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737329976505 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276670120527 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468006978341 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.