Government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Does anyone preclude scientific discovery without experimenting and analyzing different methods? The answer to this question is clear no. One cannot predict the outcome or consequences of any research prior to it’s execution. Therefore, the author’s claim that government should not fund any scientific studies whose consequences are unclear is not suitable. In every sector, there is always a scope for improvement and thus, further research can lead to disclosing the answers of the unknown.
Today’s world is advanced and much ahead from past centuries and a huge part for this is because of the new discoveries. The Newton’s discovery of the existence of gravitational force, the quantum theory, invention of electricity, telephones, etc are the examples that prove the importance of new research and how it could be helpful to the people in the world.
The medical sector, today, is able to cure most of the diseases by which people were dying in the past. For example, the discovery of the polio vaccine has almost eradicated the disease. If the funding was not available for this research, the people would still be dying because of the polio. At the time of this result, it was not certain that this medicine would prevent the disease, but by trial and error, the solution was found which helped in saving many lives.
On the other hand, the scientific research could also have an ugly side. The development of nuclear weapons are the perfect example. The egoism of the power and domination has led to made discoveries which are harmful and injurious to the human kind. Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the two cities of Japan are still suffering from the adverse effects of the nuclear bomb attack which was dropped by America dusring World war II. This shows how deadly can research could be if not controlled properly.
In conclusion, every scientific research could lead to advancement by which thousands of people lives could be impacted or it could lead to the destruction. However, if new research is carried out in controlled and required measures, the evil side could be eliminated. Thus, government should fund and support the scientific research as it could open the gateways to the new opportunities, discoveries and betterment of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | georgez | 58 | view |
- Government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 75
- In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area The Hillview landfill which has been undeveloped for decades is a perfect site for the plant The buildi 66
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more influence on children s behavior 75
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after 5 years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 54
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Realty and Fitch Realty Adams is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents In contrast Fitch has 25 many of whom work only part time Moreover Adams revenue last year was twice as high as that o 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ABOUT_ITS_NN[25]
Message: Did you mean 'to its execution'?
Suggestion: to its execution
...e or consequences of any research prior to it’s execution. Therefore, the author’s claim that gov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11559139785 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77533292223 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529569892473 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0112852603 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.157894737 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275992937573 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853970215017 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141788036511 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151321361978 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1520197388 0.0667264976115 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.