Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to the recent development of business models, for instance franchising, multinational organizations are widely aware of the importance of local communities in providing human resources and creating local marketplaces on one hand, and the dramatic costs of losing them in virtue of ignoring them on the other hand. Consequently, it seems reasonable for companies to consider a budget to build recreational facilities in order to improve the well being of local communities.
It is widely accepted that cherished companies are more profitable than others. As a result, by creating sports facilities for youngsters, huge brands can achieve an incredible psychological feat called brand attachment to create a profound brand image which is connected to positive feelings of willingness, joy, and wholesome in adolescents’ minds.
Considering the long term benefits of professional labor, corporations can turn the costs of constructing social facilities into a lucrative investment by building schools and universities in order to raise the next generation of committed workers who can not only fulfill the standards of the companies, but also can avoid insurmountable obstacles related to cultural diversities.
Focusing on supply and demand, confronting local communities seems inevitable in light of their great role in producing and also consuming the productions of companies. Therefore, disappointing or even infuriating them might end up to irreversible problems and losing the battlefield to companies which are well aware of the local communities needs.
To conclude, local communities are an integral part of any multinational organization's managerial components that needs to be taken into account and surprisingly by splitting a fair amount of their profit in format of sports and social facilities, it can enhance social aspects of a company, create bounds between the brand and locals, and eventually make a great sum of money, in return.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | linh allie | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | HaleyLin2000 | 56 | view |
- Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
- Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns are widely aware of the importance of local communities in providing human res...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, so, therefore, well, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64527027027 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33366183401 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597972972973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.213228931 49.4020404114 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 208.875 106.682146367 196% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.7667163134 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213813333337 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879028028914 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353567141515 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106747696742 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462968000739 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.7 13.0946893788 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.0 50.2224549098 34% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.3001002004 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.