Leaders and directors in organizations are normally older people. Some people think having a younger leader would be better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people beliece that young employees should be assigned organisational leaders and directors. I partly agree with this view as it depends on typical circumstances which will be elaborated below.
It is unarguable that old people are more experienced than their younger counterparts professionally and personally. First, they have worked for a long time, thereby they have faced and solved many different issues of works. Once these same problems occur, old employees can deal with them quickly. In addition, as old staff live longer, they develop self-control and self-disciplines in . The two factors help them remain calm in difficult situations and less prone to effects of these unwanted incidents. This in turn facilitates their decision-making process. Finally, the elder employee tend to be looked up by younger coleagues. Thus, it would be easier for them to manage their subordinates.
Nevertherless, there are still occasions when young individuals would perform better at managerial roles. Younger staff who are often innovative and dynamic, would find it easier to excel at tasks require creativities and are physical demanding. This is particularly the case for job relating to selling and marketing, at which young workers tend to take full advantage of their energy and imagination. Secondly, young job seekers are familiar with the new technology for the time being. This gives them the distinct advantage over their older counterparts, since technology enables the tech-savvy people to increase their productivity and efficiency at workplaces. Finally, given younger poplulation is the biggest group of customer in many businesses, younger leaders would have a deep understanding of their same-aged peers. Thus, younger workers are more appropritate for certain types of professions.
In sum, the older workers tend to be reliable for conservative businesses, while younger staff would be ideal for fast-moving industry. In my opinion, it would be beneficial for firms and their workforce if people are put at their right positions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-20 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- It is more important for a building to serve its purposes than to look beautiful Architects do not need to worry about whether it is a real work of art Do you agree or disagree 89
- Intelligence is the most important quality of leaders To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ime, thereby they have faced and solved many different issues of works. Once these same proble...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 387, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lop self-control and self-disciplines in . The two factors help them remain calm i...
^^
Line 3, column 893, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e more appropritate for certain types of professions. In sum, the older workers ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52698412698 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0857838176 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.387675003 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6315789474 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5789473684 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206921288797 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623440292568 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594277688321 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142550528131 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376676073525 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.