A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that a nation with people from different ethnic backgrounds is more fascinating and experiences faster development. From the personal perspective, I totally agree with this opinion for the two following reasons.
The reason why I believe that a nation with a combination of nationalities is unlikely to be mundane is that people can experience different unique cultures rather than being confined to one. To be more specific, in a multicultural society, one could easily encounter and learn more about a wide variety of cultural expressions from people of distinct origins such as customs, cultural events, norms, and beliefs, which is always exciting and adds spice to life. In contrast, citizens in a monocultural nation might find it monotonous since they are repeatedly exposed to just one cultural setting.
Additionally, the rationale for my concurrence that progress in multicultural nations is much quicker is that their economy can better prosper. This means that because people of different nationalities offer respective strengths and skill sets, these can be harnessed by industries. As a result, this diverse workforce will maximize a country’s production of goods and services and allow its business entities to create more profits, which will ultimately ensure the economic growth of a nation.
In conclusion, I totally subscribe to the belief that a nation with immigrants from other nations will become more fascinating and advance faster. The arguments are that their citizens are introduced to various cultures other than one, and their immigrants’ expertise will be capitalized on to build a stronger workforce for a nation’s economy. Therefore, it seems that countries should embrace higher levels of cultural diversity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-21 | grahamoneil | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | Sayansh Garg | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-21 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need the workers more Do you agree or disagree 89
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that the age limit for driving should be increased to make driving safer do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop Discuss b th views and give your own opinion 81
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays Do advantages outweigh disadvantages 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52205882353 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04478360149 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591911764706 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1898948453 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.545454545 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154975061418 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062446426522 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431010825711 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990835551723 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118953111793 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.