Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing
of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that
the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to
make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your
own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing
and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The prompt suggest that corporations should either take into consideration the wellbeing of the environment they operate in or should only be concern with operating within the law and not worrying about the wellbeing of the societies the found themselves. However, I mostly agree with the stance that corporations should in fact improve the wellbeing of the society they operate in with the following two reasons. Although, I do concede that, certain corporation do not need to put the wellbeing of the society into consideration, so far as they operate within the law and the government at large cater for the needs of the society.
First of all, an unwelcoming working environment will in no way do any good to the corporation and the society at large. Consider a corporation that utilizes large machinery and operates in a quiet environment. The noise generated might cause a huge disturbance to the innocent people of the community, which by the way may have schools and hospitals. These might make the society to take actions to cub the corporation’s noise pollution. And this, if escalated might put the company’s production at hold and at worst put the corporations out of business or in the area. In this kind of situation, it is important for any corporation to consider the wellbeing of their working environment and the community they operate in order to reach a compromise, which will be beneficial to both parties in the long run.
Secondly, a community prone to natural disasters will definitely affect a corporation operating in the area if they do not promote the wellbeing of the society they operate in. For example, a rich company can help a society and support them in times of disaster and even provide safety measures in place in advance to a disaster. This will both help the corporation in carrying out undisturbed operations and help the community at large. A safe working environment will is pertinent to an increased production and promote the society wellbeing.
In conclusion, while it may be okay for certain corporation to operate only within the law and make the most money, it is important for a corporation to cater for the wellbeing of the society they operate in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-26 | TiOluwani97 | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | PS5 | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Technoblade | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-19 | asingh1003 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Soumyadip Kar 1729 | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of video rental stores In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten video rental stores Since we are famous fo 63
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as muc 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97035040431 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97669083251 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44204851752 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1738101102 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.21951772744 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413365112007 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153728991323 0.0831039109588 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899960989657 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277007064708 0.150359130593 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395159762951 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.