Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research is increasing day by day as people are discovering new things. Yet people are unknown about many unidentified and terrifying discoveries made while doing the research. And huge amount of money invested in the process is going to waste while the money could have been used in something better. So, I mostly agree with the author that if the results or finding are not clear then government should not provide fund for that kind of scientific research and I am going to give two examples why.
Firstly, the discoveries that are made during the research or experiment can cause a lot of loss. Not every finding will upgrade us but many of these discoveries can bring terrifying results. For instance, Atom Bomb was also an experiment and many of the people did not knew that it would cause that many harm and kill a whole state. It was just an experiment and no one knew the consequences and we can see it in present day also that people are scared to talk about the attack. Not only that, for many years as a result of the attack the rain was acidic and the acid rain killed all flora and fauna. In my opinion only the finding with vivid results and consequences should be allowed otherwise the bombing like this can happen and destroy many of us.
Similarly, a lot of advancement in research is also causing the tension of creating new vicious viruses. A lot of scientists are working on different diseases and trying to find different alternatives. But sometimes this may result in creating other menacing disease which may kill or harm humans, animals as well as plants. For example, this kind of discoveries are first tested on animals and then if the result is successful then only on human. Poor animals are getting killed for the sake of new findings which may or may not work. Not only this but also disease like COVID and many more can spread which can threaten and can upside down the whole life of people. For one small discovery which may or may not work no one should risk the entire population of the globe. As it is crystal clear that many of the discoveries which are unclear are capable oh harming us as well.
Yet there may arise a question, “People can find unexpected result too even the consequences are unclear.” But with proper conclusion people can find much more and has been a lot of discoveries. In todays, date where people are dying of hunger and lack of basic needs, we cannot be more selfish and proceed to spend money on the results that are not even sure. It may or may not bear a fruitful consequence but we cannot risk entire flora and fauna for the sake of our experiment. If the money is spent on something clear and beneficial then a lot of people who are in need will receive support and help.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | sark | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | cringelord | 79 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | cringelord | 45 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I am going to give two examples why. Firstly, the discoveries that are made d...
^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'know'
Suggestion: know
...periment and many of the people did not knew that it would cause that many harm and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun harm seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much harm', 'a good deal of harm'.
Suggestion: much harm; a good deal of harm
...e did not knew that it would cause that many harm and kill a whole state. It was just an ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, similarly, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 34.0 14.8657303371 229% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56941649899 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45013093241 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452716297787 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 715.5 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0745571034 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.227272727 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5909090909 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114985040246 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377943520079 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370071280191 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757522488073 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032754088257 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.