The line chart illustrates the number of foreign visitors to three different areas including the coast, the mountain and the lakes in a European country between the year 1987 and 2007. It is clear that the number of visitors went to the lake and the coast increased significantly while the figure of visitors went to mountains seem to not grow much.
From the year 1987 to before 1992, it can be seen that while both mountains and lakes attracted more people to come to visit them, the opposite was true for the coast. From before 1992 to 1995, the number of people visited the lakes continued to increase, from 20.000 visitors to 35.000 visitors per year, in comparison with the figure in coast and and mountain, which decline rapidly. Over the next 5 years, the overseas visitors of coasts and mountains began to rise fast, the mountain went from 20 thousands to 37 thousands and the coasts went from 36 thousands to 60 thousands. In 2002, there were over 70 thousands people went to the lakes. At the same time, there was also a light change in the number of people visited the coast. By contrast, the number of vistiors to mountain declined lightly.
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 73
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 73
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acted more people to come to visit them, the opposite was true for the coast. Fro...
^^
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... in comparison with the figure in coast and and mountain, which decline rapidly. Over t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67156862745 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36009431484 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2489082865 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196974891115 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100195569362 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134595724468 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211296755847 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13166937637 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.