The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005.
The statistical line chart illustrates the number of cars that Britain’s inhabitants in 10-year intervals, starting from 1975.
As indicated the graph, there were more and more people demanding to have their own car as one-car ownership was the highest figure while the opposite was true for people with 3 cars.
As transparent from the data, there were exactly 45 people in Britain owning a car in 1975. Then, this figure experienced a significant drop to around 35 people before recovering to the initial number in 2005. As of people with 3 cars, its starting point was recorded to be roughly 43 owners. Subsequently, this number deceased dramatically to 25 people a decade later and continued to have a slight fall to approximately 23 people at the end of the period.
Another remarkable feature is 2-car ownership which held its beginning point at about 6 dwellers. Then, there were about 9 more owners who wanted to possess 2 cars in 1985. From 1985 to the end of the period, there was a minimal growth to roughly 18 people. Referring to the quantity of Britain’s citizens who did not have a car, just about 4 people being reported not to have any cars in the beginning of the period before growing minimally to 9 people in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | Manjinder_kaur | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 78
- the pie charts show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... growing minimally to 9 people in 2005.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75925925926 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70573236931 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560185185185 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1954748815 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209888077543 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914203323475 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636580940959 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139700054929 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582835750452 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.