the graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030

Essay topics:

the graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030.

The statistical line graph illustrates the quantity of people commuting to work daily in the UK by three different modes of transportation in 10-year intervals, starting from 1970 to 2030.

Overall, it can be clearly observed that travelling to work by car and train will remain the most favorable form of transportation throughout the years. In contrast, the trend for commuting by bus is predicted to fall.

As indicated in the line graph, there was about 5 million people commuting to work by car in the beginning of the period which was recorded to be the highest number during the given timeframe. Subsequently, this figure increased minimally in 1980 before showing a gradual growth to roughly 9 million people in 2020. Besides, it is expected to keep rising to 9 million in 2030. Additionally, commuting by train was the least popular choice when showing a starting point at just under 3 million people in 1970. After that, the number of inhabitants in the UK choosing train to arrive at work grew dramatically to 3 million people in 2000 and then experienced a period of stability before being forecasted to climb to approximately 5 million people in 2030.

Another key feature is bus which used to be the second most popular form of transport between 1970 and 1980. However, from this milestone and onwards, it is foreseen to have a gradual fall to reach the lowest point at just under 3 million people, becoming the least popular option when workers commuting to work.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-10 chipchip99 67 view
2023-08-27 chau hoang 73 view
2023-08-27 chau hoang 61 view
2023-07-26 xuongrongnho view
2023-07-26 xuongrongnho 10 view
Essays by user nguyen thanh sang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to train'
Suggestion: to train
...umber of inhabitants in the UK choosing train to arrive at work grew dramatically to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 573, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'arriving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: arriving
...of inhabitants in the UK choosing train to arrive at work grew dramatically to 3 million ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, second, then, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 252.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90476190476 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81637582526 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5885405267 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.6 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240958225157 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949525998636 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413227758791 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141081474896 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330726449962 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.