people who accept criticism are more likely to succeed in group work
Personally, I full agree with the idea that people who are strong enough to accept judgement and criticism are more possibly succeed in group work. I will elaborate on my point of views later and use specific examples to clarify the reasons.
To begin with, people who are able to accept and understand criticism definitely can put themselves into others' shoes since they can realize the reason why they accept different and opposite opinions from others. That is, they are empathy and capable of recognizing the problem in a group. Hence, when the teammate of this kind of people is confronted with some predicaments or bottlenecks in a group project, people who are empathy enough will try to figure out what lead to the problem and exert their own ability and influence to help the whole group to get rid of the problem and negative situation, instead of merely complaining about the status quo. This is a very vital streak to make a group better and collaborative. Hence, I think that people who can accept disparate opinions from critics are empathy enough so that they will take others' situation into consideration and lead the whole group to solve problem they meet.
Second, it is trust that build up a solid group which will not lose their tenacity easily when they face tough task. Accepting criticism means people can realize that others' argument might be beneficial to the group. To put it differently, when a group member raise his hand and deliver his point on a topic, which is fully opposed to my opinions. If I can accept his judgement and find it viable to our group progress, I will definitely support the point he raises and encourage him keep doing this since it is meritorious and fruitful for our group. It is because I trust him so I can accept good proposal, or I will just doubt his motivation, opinions, and all his proposals.
Last but not least, I contend that the mutual information plays an important role in group work. As long as we can understand the whole picture of our task and share the percentage of the task to members, we can finish any arduous and formidable tasks effectively and efficiently. People who can understand the argument which is totally opposite are tend to share his or her own information to members in a group because they won't hide information for fear of being scold or criticized. Therefore, the work of whole group can go more smoothly and each other will hold mutual concept and information to move on together. It really matters for a group to succeed. In a word, this kind of people are more probable to succeed in group work since they understand they can share anything even they will be criticized.
To summarize, given the reasons I mentioned above, I am of the opinion that it will be more fit to group work for those people who are not vulnerable and susceptible to criticism. They can trust their teammates, be empathy with their fellows when bumping into difficulties, and share mutual information, all leading to a better conditions to build a good group. This is why I think this way.
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 70
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sc 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities Use sp 73
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs Many pterosaurs were very large some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capabl 80
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... bottlenecks in a group project, people who are empathy enough will try to figure out w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...criticism means people can realize that others argument might be beneficial to the gro...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
... argument which is totally opposite are tend to share his or her own information to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, really, second, so, therefore, i think, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2536.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 536.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73134328358 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61319799144 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.44776119403 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 791.1 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6607374477 48.9658058833 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.761904762 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5238095238 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35604166299 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124347921856 0.076458572812 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112477065177 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231548249074 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756582192376 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.