It is a more effective way to learn to work as a team than to work on one’s own. Do you agree or disagree?
It has been widely debated whether it is a more effective way to learn to work as a team than to work on one's own. I concur with the view that learning work as a team is more efficacious than finding it out for oneself. In my opinion, people can benefit more from spending time with team who are different from them. Doing so creates opportunities for learning a diversity of knowledge about duty and can expand one's world view.
Fundamentally, learning work with different people generates opportunities to gain knowledge from others belong to one team. This is largely because friends who have different hobbies, tastes, and experiences can encourage a person to get new information under one's belt far beyond his or her default knowledge. For example, When I was in college, I had to research television program preference of children; I felt a sense of helplessness, not knowing survey method nor any children near me. However, one of my friends who has a wealth of experience in research helped me, willingly shared her know-how. We worked together as a team at that moment. If I had investigated children's television program preference alone, then I probably would not finished it. So I am convinced that my knowledge is greatly enriched by her sharing information.
On top of that, It is helpful for us to learn to work, joining with friends who are different from us broaden our outlook on life. The reason is that friends who are special lists in different fields of study or hold divergent political or social opinions can dramatically open a person's eyes to new aspects of life by sharing their knowledge and stories. Studies by Cambridge University have shown that people who work with dissimilar friends experience expanded perspectives and learned to work quickly. This is because people become more open-minded when they are frequently around friends who have different backgrounds or beliefs from their own. These same studies pointed out that people who associate with a wide range of friends find it easier to learn to work and adjust to unusual tasks because of their expanded view points.
To sum up, dissimilar friends can introduce new information to us and show us different ways of looking at life including works. In this regard, I strongly maintain that learning to work as a team has advantages over working on ourselves.
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
- Some say that in today s world the value of humanities has been eclipsed by the necessity of preparing for specific wealth producing careers such as medicine Discuss whether you think there is a role in today s changing world for study of the humanities 69
- All scientific discoveries should be shared among other scientists all over the world Do you agree or disagree 76
- some people believe that it is good to do multiple jobs,while others believe that it is better to focus on one job?Do you agree or disagree?I 67
- The claim that animals have "rights" has been subject to much of a debate since 1970. Are zoos helping or hurting animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 77
people can benefit more from spending time with team who are different from them.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
learning work with different people generates opportunities to gain knowledge from others belong to one team.
learning work with different people generates opportunities to gain knowledge from others who belong to one team.
learning work with different people generates opportunities to gain knowledge from others belonging to one team.
It is helpful for us to learn to work, joining with friends who are different from us broaden our outlook on life.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
friends who are special lists in different fields of study
friends who are in special lists in different fields of study
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 397 350
No. of Characters: 1921 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.464 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.839 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.764 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 146 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 117 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 71 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.056 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.09 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.349 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.524 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.161 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5