4.11.2017: It is difficult for people inm the cities to get enough physical exercises. What are the reasons? What are the solutions?
Taking part in physical activities is essential for maintaining health, but having opportunities to do exercises has become hard for city dwellers. Several reasons can explain this tendency, I believe that urban residents find it challenging to access physical activities can be tackled by some solutions.
Various reasons explained why residents can not get enough physical activity. The first reason relates to the growth of population so that people have to deal with the issue called the lack of accommodation. Both government and habitats only concentrate on expanding space for housing, and apartments and ignore the amenities, especially sports centers or parks. As a result, dwellers find it hard to exercise or enjoy outdoor activities. In addition, the technological era requires people to work hard to have better positions and achieve their ambition so they suffer from various stresses. For instance, they have to work a nine-to-five work and experience stress in the workplace which makes them feel exhausted. Therefore, residents tend to participate in entertainment instead of working out.
Despite, so many factors contributing to less physical exercise, some measures should be taken to make exercising easy for city people. Firstly, governments should invest in funding for parks, sidewalks, and sports centers so people can find doing exercises enjoyable and have chances to relax and immerse in nature. Furthermore, individuals should balance work and entertainment which creates a comfortable workout without concern about workload. Also, they can spend more time taking care of their physical and mental health.
To conclude, it is reiterated that a healthy body contains a sound mind and it is the responsibility of society as a whole to provide opportunities and to uplift the morale of city people who are either busy or have fewer facilities for the workout.
- Some people believe that media should be allowed to publish information about the private lives of famous people Others say that everybody has a right to privacy and this practice must be controlled or even stopped Discuss both views 78
- Some people believe that each countries provide poorer countries with other types of help rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- With increasing populations and even growing urabn centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty How can this be solved 78
- In some countries many more people are chossing to live alone nowadays than in the peast Positive or negative development 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accessing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accessing
...hat urban residents find it challenging to access physical activities can be tackled by s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...issue called the lack of accommodation. Both government and habitats only concen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42517006803 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98797666242 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9219057594 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19527084918 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067308129184 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054873228402 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11996231145 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246856413061 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accessing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accessing
...hat urban residents find it challenging to access physical activities can be tackled by s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...issue called the lack of accommodation. Both government and habitats only concen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42517006803 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98797666242 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9219057594 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19527084918 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067308129184 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054873228402 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11996231145 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246856413061 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.