The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
How frequently Americans had meals at fast food restaurants during the period of time from 2003 to 2013 can be revealed as follows.
Overall, people were more likely to eat fast food once a week rather than other given categories.
As regards the first, the figures of people consuming fast food every day, and those who never ate it suffered from a slight decrease at around under 5% of people for the whole period. Similarly, the proportion of people eating fast food several times a week modestly fell by 2% of people despite a slight increase in 2006. Meanwhile, the percentages of Americans who had fast food as a meal once a week and once or twice a month had a reverse trend but with various levels of increase and decrease. Particularly, the former experienced an upward trend with the highest point being recorded at around 25% in 2006, while the latter significantly declined from 25% to 20% of people in the same year. Besides, there was a gradual improvement in the number of fast food meals being consumed by Americans a few times a year in 2003 before staying at the same level with approximately 15% of people at the end of the research period.
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 70
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...als at fast food restaurants during the period of time from 2003 to 2013 can be revealed as fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, similarly, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69902912621 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58305345334 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.5549795636 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.285714286 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249252389686 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127031571076 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745231981501 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188650576004 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663504003578 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.