The line chart illustrates changes in the disburse on five different research namely health, space, energy, general science and other of the US government during the 29-year period.
Overall, the US government shows their preference for health research the most among all. Additionally, all categories witnessed an upward trend over these years surveyed.
In detail, the amount of money poured into health research always possessed the highest position, standing at approximately 8 billion dollars in the first year, and then reaching a peak of over 20 measured units in 2004. Since then, money allocated for this research declined slightly to under 20 billion dollars in the last year. By contrast, there was a stability in the spending on energy during the first 12 years at roughly 2,5 billion dollars. 16 years onwards, this consumption witnessed negligible growth with its figure increasing from about 5 to just over 5 billion of dollars in 2008.
Regarding the two remaining categories, it can be seen that these figures showed a relatively similar pattern. To be exact, the amount of money used for space research fluctuated noticeably between 6 and 9 billion of dollars from 1980 to 2004 before peaking at nearly 10 billion dollars in 2008. This was followed by that of other, experiencing an uneven movement, which was around 6 measured units over the period.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 78
- The table below give information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 10
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Many of the cities are currently facing a serious housing shortage What are some of the reasons for this shortage and what solutions can you suggest 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The line chart illustrates changes in the disburse on five different research namely healt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17937219731 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68902795124 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627802690583 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2624548541 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144564596619 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558568390708 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509466302704 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902209227425 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120339394166 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.