Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. Do you agree or disagree?
School papers are the utmost effective method to examine the conduct of a scholar in learning institutes. On the other hand, constant assignments such as coursework and projects are not always the best approach to appraising pupils' performance in the subject. It is agreed that formal tests should be held by lecturers on how their students actually do on the test but not regularly. This essay will analyze why proper examinations need to be organized in class and why teachers should not only be dependent on continual coursework or project activities.
To begin with, whenever a school examination is held, there is the presence of the school's teachers and supervisors to ensure that there is less or no probability of cheating. It is undeniable that students should be thoroughly observed by the examiners since they will be afraid of being punished and they do not cheat on others' work. Apprentices will try their best to show how they perform on the test without relying on anyone. In addition, formal exams can benefit teachers to make sure that deserving students will receive good marks and outrank other classmates. Therefore, an organization of the proper test plays a vital role in assuring the capability of apprentices effectively along with the strict observation of teachers.
On the flip side, holding practical assignments regularly cannot give the apparently obvious picture to teachers and parents. For example, in universities and colleges, graduates can simply copy others' project tests and teachers fail to assess the real accomplishment of their disciples. Sadly, the phenomenon of plagiarism is challenging to deter and it can hamper the students to the success since college individuals do not use their own acquired knowledge and experiences to complete the task but instead passively copy others' work. This can be adverse to access to their future careers with a high position in the workplace.
Put it all together, the appropriate examinations should be held in the presence of examiners for it advantageous to check how students actually perform on their tasks to achieve the satisfactory result deserves with their ability. However, continual assessments cannot be a lucrative technique for teachers to depend on to mark the final grade of their tests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-01 | TuVo | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-21 | tahmeed1993 | 78 | view |
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this Do you agree or disagree 84
- tu
- Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student s performance Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this Do you agree or disagree 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional culture are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Many criminals re offend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'deterring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: deterring
...phenomenon of plagiarism is challenging to deter and it can hamper the students to the s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, however, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23913043478 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91879198379 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.226329425 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.533333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210839201525 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670986028867 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040709426697 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134633680461 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063790275216 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'deterring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: deterring
...phenomenon of plagiarism is challenging to deter and it can hamper the students to the s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, apparently, but, however, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23913043478 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91879198379 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.226329425 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.533333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210839201525 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670986028867 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040709426697 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134633680461 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063790275216 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.