The supplied diagram presents information about the visitors’ percentage in four different attractions namely art gallery, pavilion, pier and festival in Brighton. Overall more tourists preferred visiting pavilion while the attractions of art gallery among tourists decreased over time.
As is presented in the line graph, initially in 1980, 10% tourists in England visited pier in Brighton which was the least percentage among the give four spots. In this year festival attracted highest percentage of tourists (30%) while art gallery and pavilion received about 22-25% of total tourists. After 5 years the percentage of visit in art gallery by tourists in England rocketed and reached to over 38%. In this year this was the highest percentage of visit among the given four attractions. At that time popularity of pier and pavilion both increased with 15% and about 27% respectively while the opposite trend could be observed in case of the festival. After 1985, the popularity of pavilion started booming and reached to the pick at about 48% in 1995. In this year festival and art gallery managed to get about 22-25% tourists. Finally in the year 2010, the percentage of tourists in art gallery reached to its lowest (below 10%) while pavilion received more than 30% of tourists which was the highest. The other two attractions received about 22-28 percent tourists in this year.
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 67
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'attracted the highest'.
Suggestion: attracted the highest
... give four spots. In this year festival attracted highest percentage of tourists 30% while art ga...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 840, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...y managed to get about 22-25% tourists. Finally in the year 2010, the percentage of tou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17410714286 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62502657299 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473214285714 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3945879974 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195072128864 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924254076263 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729738706941 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180784717317 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208575165467 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.