Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
One might have heard of the saying that "Change is the only constant". Time never stops for anybody and with time there are certainly changes which are inevitable. While change can lead to progress but that is not necessarily true in all cases. Therefore, I disagree with the claim that in any field, the leaders or those in power should step down in five years for mainly two reasons.
First and foremost, great leaders who begin the revolution of positive changes need comparatively more amount of time to create a growing and sustainable society around them. If their longer vision seems to be satisfactory to majority of people, there is no need for them to step down after a certain amount of years. For instance, Narendra Modi, the Prime Minister of India continued his tenure after a successfull first four years as the Prime Minister of India. In such a way if a leader is not provided with support and time, expecting quick success is not the right way to proceed.
Secondly, frequent changes in the leadership role might lead to unstability. It is observed quite a few times that too many changes in a short amount of time worsen the condition rather than improving it. For example, a manager of football team plays a huge role in how well the team performs. Chelsea, a famous football club in the UK is known for sacking its managers as soon as things seem to go down the hill. As a result, recently they have been struggling to get good results after frequent changes in the managerial role. While changes might bring in a new zeal and a hint of positivity, frequent changes would not help in improving the condition everytime.
Although, the reson for the claim that in any field, the leaders or those in power should step down in five years might be true in some cases but it can not be stated that the surest path to success for any organization is by changing the leadership role after a certain amount of fixed years.
In conclusion, I believe that organizations and society have different scenarios and generalizing the amount time given to evry leadership would not be the right way to go about it. Those who believe that do that at their own peril.
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 61
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College To serve the housing needs of our students Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories Buckingham s enrollment is growing and based on current tren 55
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man 59
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 75
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in all cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69090909091 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6015291895 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506493506494 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9405670631 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.235294118 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209873447987 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642124115415 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103647387037 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139375810821 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121526969248 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.