Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
As there is a word “stagnation,” it is often deemed true that any field requires revitalization for success, and consequently that leaders should relinquish their leadership after five years. Although I agree with in part that revitalization is one of the effective measure that can bring success, I do not agree with that it is the surest path to success. Therefore, I do not also believe that the leaders in every field should step down every five years.
Granted, in the fields like politics and government, revitalization through the regime change is often an effective way for the success of nation. For example, in the case of dealing with Donald Trump, the change of the presidency from him to Biden greatly alleviated the global tension existed among Russia and Western countries. Although it is controversial, the pungnacious policy he made against Mexcio and Arabic countries is in general considered to have exacerbated the fracture between Russia and Western country, thereby diminishing the governance of the US and resulting in the Russia-Ukraine war. In addition to this recent example, the regime change in general entails the abolish of problematic old policies, so it is one of the effective way to bring success to a nation.
Regardless of the previous case, however, the frequent change of the leadership is not always the surest path to success. For example, a myriad of historical success could not have been accomplished were it not for the long-term leadership by a single figure. Every kings and emperors with the successful reigneth should be the epitomical example, but take Franklin Roosevelt as an example. The policies he implemented throughout the Great Depression, which played a pivotal role in the US’s overcoming of the depression, was too radical that it is logical to expect that the successors of him would not have followed. Therefore, the case of Roosevelt reveals that in some cases long-term leadership is more effective method for success than revitalization through new leadership.
Moreover, the long-term leadership is often effective in the success of business. Take Elon Musk as an example. As everyone may know, he is one of the richest figures in the entire world, and what is more galvanizing is that his success is entirely enabled by his insight towards the future. Before Tesla Motors, the electric car was deemed daydream, so there was virtually no companies except Tesla which seriously tried to develop it. However, Musk adamantly believed that electric car will be the only option for the future generation owing to its eco-friendliness, let alone the limited amount of petroleum, so he devoted himself into devopling and refining electric cars. Now, as all people might know, Tasla is one of the most influential and the largest electric car company. I believe this reveals the effectiveness the Musk’s long-term leadership, and consequently the possible positive effect of long-term leadership on the success of business.
In conclusion, the revitalization of the leadership is not always the most promising way to success, and therefore not every field should change their leaders every five years. Rather, even in politics, long-term leadership has historically been proven to be effective to success to some extent.
- Some people believe that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit Others believe that formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely align 50
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one t 65
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 83
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 62
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated Write a response in which you discuss the ext 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 681, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e, the regime change in general entails the abolish of problematic old policies, so it is o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, may, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in general, in some cases, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2765.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23674242424 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00250925727 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469696969697 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 866.7 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.406173786 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.19047619048 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218346389228 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693205631676 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618282014792 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136796475902 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695077495631 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.