There has been a rising nervousness among individuals whether they are inside or outside their houses. Such a state of affairs would be attributed to the higher crime rate and potential risks on the road, and this essay will suggest viable solutions to deal with the situation, including offering residents more jobs, installing smart security devices, and imposing effective policies on traffic.
To commence with, there would be several reasons why an increasing number of people face safety problems no matter where they are. Such anxiety would firstly be added by the growing crime rate, ranging from house robbery to pickpocketing or murder. This, in fact, would mostly happen in developing countries where some residents tend to rely on committing crimes for survival. This would be illustrated by a report by the New York Times showing that there was a surge in the rate of crime to about 40% in 2020. Second, there have been more dangers on the road in recent years. Specifically, traffic and driving offences, such as over-speeding or drunk driving, dramatically increase, thereby escalating the rate of suffering road accidents. For that reason, people's worries about their safety when traveling would be unavoidable.
Some measures should be implemented to remedy the issue. First, it is vitally important for the government to help citizens out of poverty and into employment by providing more job opportunities. With increasing prosperity and chances thanks to such an approach, the need to steal from others would be reduced, offering people the feeling of safety. Moreover, more security devices, such as surveillance cameras, alarm bells or smart locks, should be installed in residential areas. These devices can serve as an effective deterrent to would-be offenders. In terms of greater security on the roads, stricter policies on the volume of traffic as well as driving offences should be introduced, which is likely to enforce road safety and ease people’s fear when going out.
In conclusion, the relatively high number of criminals and dangers in traffic participation seem to be blamed for the sense of insecurity when individuals are either at home or on the streets. However, several feasible measures could be taken to resolve this problem.
- The bar charts below provide information about percentages of students who are proficient in a foreign language in different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and inclu 56
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the world 89
- Topic The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26170798898 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78186723237 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595041322314 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4937816469 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.352941176 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943512155947 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298565187635 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332701891348 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063184596005 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193365109562 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26170798898 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78186723237 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595041322314 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4937816469 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.352941176 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0943512155947 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298565187635 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332701891348 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063184596005 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193365109562 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.