In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why do people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food?
Hitherto, it has become increasingly common for individuals in many countries to choose imported food over locally produced food. While this phenomenon is understandable, there are various measures that could be taken to encourage consumers to buy local products.
Admittedly, the perception that foreign food is of higher quality than local food persists among consumers. This is partly due to the reputation that foreign companies have built up over time, as well as their effective marketing strategies. For example, companies like Coca-Cola and McDonald's are global brands that have become household names around the world, whereas local companies may not have the same level of recognition. Additionally, the use of celebrities and influencers in advertising campaigns has been a common tactic to increase the popularity of foreign products. These factors contribute to why people may prefer to purchase imported food.
To address this issue, there are several potential solutions to encourage people to buy local food. One approach is to increase the visibility and accessibility of local food products. Farmers' markets and community-supported agriculture programs can help connect consumers with local producers, providing them with fresh and high-quality products. Another solution is to promote the health and environmental benefits of buying locally produced food. For example, local food is often fresher and more nutritious, and it has a smaller carbon footprint due to reduced transportation and packaging costs.Moreover, the government can play a crucial role in incentivizing the consumption of local food. They could reduce taxes and tariffs on local food products while increasing those on imported goods, making local products more affordable and competitive. In addition, the government can also invest in supporting local food producers and processors, such as providing financial assistance, infrastructure, and education programs. By doing so, they can help improve the quality and quantity of local products, which will in turn encourage consumers to buy them.
In conclusion, while the preference for imported food is understandable, there are several strategies that could be implemented to encourage consumers to buy locally produced food. These include increasing the visibility and accessibility of local products, promoting the health and environmental benefits of local food, and incentivizing the consumption of local products through government policies and support.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-27 | nvtrung309 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | nvtrung309 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | quynhnhu1921996 | 70 | view |
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 2000 84
- The chart shows Australian home Internet use by reasons and age groups Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...uced transportation and packaging costs.Moreover, the government can play a crucial role...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2134.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79891304348 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21537098731 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510869565217 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5481853998 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.529411765 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496787629048 0.244688304435 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182501890805 0.084324248473 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120133443614 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335940932805 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885193912368 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.