Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt, in these modern eras, thanks to the development of technology, most of people in societies are tend to use facilitates smart devices which they need to have access on high-speed internet, due to this fact, in contrast to some people who are inclined to this belief that governments have to improve the public transportation, I am of the opinion that improving the internet access is critical for modern societies. I will mention two of my reasons to prove my idea.
One of the first primary reasons that I mention is that today more than eighty percent of citizens in each country need internet access for various demands like study, researching, conferences, etc. To be more specific, I can observe that these days because of the improvement of technology, most of human use online platforms and applications to gain information or have meetings, especially after Covid-19, it is significantly observable because in this time, people even should not use public transportation to preserve their health, then, they have started to use video conference for their business or attending classes online. So I think the improvement internet access is a necessity. As an illustration, I can point out my younger brother, Who is a student, since the expanding Covid-19 his school classes completely has changed from school-based to internet-based, so I strongly believe that this is vital that the governments spend money and enhance internet access.
The other reason striking my mind is that, in these modern eras, people strive to preserve their cash and time from being lost, in this way, improved internet access has a significant role. In detail, When citizens of a country have easy access to the internet, they can reach all around the country's resources through online shops at a limited time, which is useful for saving specific hours of their life and allocating on new educational materials. Because people can access various goods in online pages and choose the economic and better quality which is provided due to government spending budget on internet access. For instance, I remember that my father bought his cars accessories from the grand bazaar where need use of public transportation, then he was so tired after shopping because he had to passed two hours way by underground train, but these days he can purchase those accessories even cheaper with better quality due to internet access.
To wrap it up, As I mentioned in previous paragraphs, governments have to allocate budget on the improvement of internet access rather than public transportation. Firstly, citizens can improve their abilities like knowledge and preserve their health situations during pandemics, second, they can conserve their money and time.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure how they respond to specifics presented in the reading passage 3
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...hanks to the development of technology, most of people in societies are tend to use facilitate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...nology, most of people in societies are tend to use facilitates smart devices which ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, then, for instance, i think, in contrast, no doubt, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18161434978 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8912753839 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522421524664 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.360655947 48.9658058833 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 192.583333333 100.406767564 192% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1666666667 20.6045352989 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269132340623 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114578335151 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483376317382 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182223984901 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286665482993 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 11.7677419355 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.1575268817 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...hanks to the development of technology, most of people in societies are tend to use facilitate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...nology, most of people in societies are tend to use facilitates smart devices which ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, then, for instance, i think, in contrast, no doubt, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18161434978 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8912753839 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522421524664 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.360655947 48.9658058833 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 192.583333333 100.406767564 192% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1666666667 20.6045352989 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 5.45110844103 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269132340623 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114578335151 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483376317382 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182223984901 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286665482993 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 11.7677419355 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.1575268817 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.