The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages

With the great support from state-of-the-art technology, meeting in person is no longer preferable in our society. Personally, I highly believe that virtual communication has more drawbacks than benefits.

On the one hand, even though the online meeting has conspicuous disadvantages, its usefulness is indisputable. First of all, it will facilitate the way we communicate through its massive convenience. This can be justified by the large-scale coverage of online networks across the globe. As a result, connecting to a person from another pole of the earth is easier than ever. Secondly, the ubiquity of online interaction also results in new ways to enrich. For example, myriads of online classes have been established so far, and millions of dollars have been made by them.

On the other hand, potential negative impacts from virtual interaction can be attributed to some reasons. Firstly, it will have detrimental effects on the essence of friendship. One of the justifications is that people will have less time to meet each other in reality, which leads to an unhealthy bond between them. Moreover, it will be more difficult for people to find out pals and foes. In consequence, we are more likely to be deceived when we are trying to make friends. Secondly, some fields that use online interaction as an alternative way of working will probably suffer from disorder in the operating process. For instance, despite the array of advantages that distance learning brings to us, it is fraught with issues that urgently need solutions such as how can teachers manage their students effectively.

In short, the disadvantages of online interaction outweigh its disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in short, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2947761194 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08114753773 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615671641791 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0306859706 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0734239986921 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258277408201 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038337562506 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.060771758766 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586006888524 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in short, such as, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2947761194 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08114753773 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615671641791 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0306859706 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0734239986921 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258277408201 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038337562506 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.060771758766 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586006888524 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.