Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, countries are becoming more and more similar due to the fact people are able to buy the same brands anywhere. In my opinion, I think this has both disadvantages and advantages.
First of all, it has been seen that if people are buying the same thing more and more, there will be more comments and rates about that profit so other customers can easily know how good it is. Therefore, if the products are a little bit bad, individuals can make a choice rapidly to buy other things which are better so the company who produce those commodities have to solve the problem and make them nicer.
However, there is a number of disadvantages of it. Firstly, buying the same thing cause some situations like: there are not any unique revolutions of styles, colors and so on. It makes families from all over the world have thought behind the times about the way to recognize the beauty, style of the products. Therefore, people can not develop well in the future. That will make us decrease our standard of life and society.
By those above proofs, it has been seen that buying the same things is not bad but also not good at all so I think that communities should buy the same things on the contrary they also have to try to study more and more for creating more new and unique amounts and inventions.
In conclusion, we ought not to stand still and have to upgrade all of all to make things newer, better. That is the positive development for the humankind, the countries all over the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-25 | Guiseppe59192 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-30 | tunganhle388@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | saminhsn | 61 | view |
| 2016-09-26 | aldyth | 71 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think is a positive or negative development 56
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...it is. Therefore, if the products are a little bit bad, individuals can make a choice rapi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase our standard of life and society. By those above proofs, it has been seen ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58888888889 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38935970095 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4232639937 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315907215238 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110228538057 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124603167338 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187110371496 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106722820546 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.