Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Nowadays, mobile phones play an indispensable part in children's lives. There are several causes behind this trend and personally, I believe this development brings more harm than good.
On the one hand, some relatable rationales can be anticipated for this phenomenon. The major one is entertainment devices could be extremely addictive and accessible as they contain a vast amount of interesting information. For instance, children spend at least 7 hours every day playing Minecraft, which is the most preferable game on smartphones. Further justifications might include erroneous parenting methods. Parents have to dedicate time to their work; hence, lacking time to monitor the number of hours children invest in smartphones.
On the other hand, there is a reason why I argue that this trend exerts a myriad of detrimental effects not only on the child's future but also society. Firstly, the more time allocated to mobile phones, the less time spent on doing outdoor activities. In the long run, this can form a sedentary lifestyle that affects both children's mental health as well as physical health. A concrete example of this is the green screen light result in visual impairment or down syndrome in children. More severe is the gradual creation of violent behaviors, which later turn into serious crimes such as murder or thief.
To conclude, some children spend hours daily on their mobile phones is a growing concern among parents. From my perspective, there are many causes and I claim that this is a harmful development with the aforementioned supporting ideas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-21 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | hinhin411 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | nle2006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...at affects both childrens mental health as well as physical health. A concrete example of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, well, at least, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22924901186 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85714709761 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664031620553 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3511722888 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247167176607 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739240629043 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530551765983 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139634484197 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282095259678 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.