The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption in the USA since 1980, with projections until 2030.
The provided line graph illustrates the trends of six different fuel consumption in USA over 50 year period.
Overall, Petrol and Oil as well as Coal and Natural Gas had gradual increase and will continue to grow in a similar pace for except Natural Gas. Other fuel on the other hand, had minimal difference.
Initially, petrol and oil started at 35 quadrillion which in the next five year dropped to just above 30, and again rose to the nearby unit as earlier. It then had fluctuation but in an upward trend and is expected to reach around 50 Quadrillion unit in 2030.
Natural Gas occupied 20 Quadrillion Unit in 1980 which fell slightly and will continue to fluctuate upward to around 25 Quadrillion unit till 2015, after which it will remain constant. Coal on the other hand was 4 quadrillion unit below Natural Gas and will have similar pattern of fluctuation exceeding Quadrillion Unit in 2030.
Nuclear, Solar/Wind, Hydropower all started approximately at 4 Quadrillion unit which rose slightly for around seven years. The first two will have mere up shift after few fluctuations, whereas hydropower will remain constant from the year 2012.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed school 56
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- You want to sell some of your furniture You think a friend of yours might like to buy it from you Write a letter to your friend In your letter explain why you are selling describe the furniture suggest a date when your friend can come and see the furnitur 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, well, whereas, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0103626943 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71532253254 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569948186528 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4559120695 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0573614752861 0.215688989381 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277180138355 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341888665252 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0385796084339 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377579365129 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.