The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is an ongoing controversy regarding whether equipping parents with parental skills could be the most effective method to reduce the rate of juvenile delinquency. Although, I partly acknowledge that this approach might be efficient to some extent, I would advocate that there are other feasible measures that should be applied.
On the one hand, a vast array of factors has convinced me to support the former perception. Firstly, educating parental skills might enable fathers and mothers to be aware of the magnitude of reducing family abuse and conflicts owing to the fact that these things can exert adverse repercussions on the codes of behaviors and the mindset of children. Therefore, if youngsters usually expose to family contradictions, they might become more aggressive, rendering them more likely to commit crimes in time to come. Furthermore, being equipped with parental skills would be conducive for parents to instill positive ethical values into their children. To illustrate, parents having these skills are capable of conveying knowledge such as how to prevent from being affected by detrimental things or differentiate good behaviors from bad ones to their offspring. Ultimately, this helps children stay away from actions associated with violating the laws.
On the other hand, I would think that there are some other effective ways to tackle this problem. The first feasible measure is that educational institutions ought to add more disciplines encompassing moral values to their teaching syllabus. This is because when going to schools, juveniles are able to acquire a thorough understanding of positive and negative behaviors through learning these subjects. For instance, studying civil education at schools allows pupils to gain more knowledge relating to how to behave with other counterparts. Hence, they are inclined not to get physical or have bad demeanors towards others. Moreover, another way is that parents need to spare more time for listening to and sympathizing with their children. By doing so, their offspring can perceive that they are adored by their relatives and can escape from stress and depression, which are the primary drivers altering the mindset and behaviors of children to be negative.
In conclusion, explicitly, it is indisputable that training parents with parental skills could be auspicious in terms of reducing youth crimes; nevertheless, I want to affirm that some other effective ways should be taken into account. Besides that, from my perspective, it is much better for parents and schools to join hands to solve this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-02 | hieuasroma@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | chirag1234 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 56
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits 78
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000 56
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36046511628 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81637508718 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560465116279 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5716763994 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.315789474 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410230023037 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132054794402 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158828644441 0.0667982634062 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325630075893 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.288967245432 0.056905535591 508% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36046511628 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81637508718 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560465116279 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5716763994 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.315789474 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6315789474 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410230023037 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132054794402 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158828644441 0.0667982634062 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325630075893 0.151304729494 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.288967245432 0.056905535591 508% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.