The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is an ongoing controversy regarding whether equipping parents with perental skills could be the most effective method to reduce the rate of juvenile delinquency. Although, I partly acknowledge that this approach might be efficient to some extent, I would advocate that there are other feasible measures that should be applied.
On the one hand, a vast array of factors has convinced me to support the former perception. Firstly, educating parental skills might enable fathers and mothers to be aware of the magnitude of reducing family abuse and conflicts owing to the fact that these things can exert adverse repercussions on the codes of behaviors and the mindset of children. Therefore, if youngsters usually experience family abuse, they might become more aggrassive, rendering them more likely to commite crimes in time to come. Furthermore, being equipped with parental skills woud be conducive for parents to instilling the positive ethnical values into their children. To illustrate, parents having these skills are capable of conveying knowledge such as how to prevent from being affected by detrimental things or differentiate good behaviors from the bad ones to their offspring. Ultimately, children may become aware of what they need to do in order not to violate the laws.
On the other hand, I would think that there are some other effective ways to tackle this problem. The first feasible measure is that educational institutions ought to add more disciplines associated with moral values to their teaching syllabus. This is because when going to schools, juvenile are able to acquire a thorough understanding of positive and negative behaviors. For instance, studying civil education at schools allows pupils to gain more knowledge relating to how to behave with other counterparts. Hence, they are inclined not to get physical or have bad demeanors towards others. Moreover, another way is that parents need to spare more time for listening and sympathizing their children. By doing so, their offspring can perceive that they are adored by their relatives and can escape from stress and depression, which are primary drivers altering the mindset and behaviors of children to be negative.
In conclusion, explicitly, it is indisputable that training parents with parental skills could be auspicious in terms of reducing youth crimes; nevertheless, it want to affirm that some other effective ways should be taken into account. Besides that, from my perspective, it is much better for parents and schools to join hand to solve this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'wants'?
Suggestion: wants
...reducing youth crimes; nevertheless, it want to affirm that some other effective way...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32678132678 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80776797895 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565110565111 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9332150317 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.529411765 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9411764706 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76470588235 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287692249694 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833674263279 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687378757858 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177284309683 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428031382376 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.