The line graph demonstrates how the European elderly spent their leisure time in the period from 1980 to 2010.
As can be seen from the graph, while theatre experienced a fractional drop, others had growth. In addition, it is obvious that older people tend to enjoy playing sports most and surfing the Internet least most of the time.
Mostly, hiking experienced a dramatic rise and upsurge like a straight line. It stood at 20% in the 1980s, then happened to be the most appealing activity done by seniors in the 2010s, at 80%. However, playing sports generally did not show any sharp change during the given time.
Moving on to the other behavior, surfing the Internet suffered the strongest boom. In the 1980s, it was not really well known, but it increase gradually over two decades period, then more suddenly to 50% in the next decade. In the same fashion, reading saw a sharp improvement during the duration, which started at 30% to 60% at the end of the period. Meanwhile, spending time in the theatre declined gently, from 50% in the 1980s to 45% in the 2010s.
- It is inevitable that as technology develops traditional cultures must be lost Technology and tradition are incompatible You cannot have both together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The pie charts below compare the proportion of energy capacity in gigawatts GW in 2015 with the predictions for 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the Europe spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...s, it was not really well known, but it increase gradually over two decades period, then...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, really, then, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73404255319 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39186697254 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.4997560961 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11679476761 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046512045322 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828781470775 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986358996769 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109078362245 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.