The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
The author contends that the human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only the tools of human minds. Admittedly, with the advancements of technology machines have become increasingly intelligent with the ability to perform a wide variety of tasks. However, I believe that human minds will always be superior to machines because of our abilities to make value judgments, process information emotionally, and create new ideas.
To begin with, human minds will always surpass machines in decision-making since we can make a judgment based on our past experiences and learn from our mistakes. For instance, search engines such as Google can make pretty good judgments on recommendations to the query asked by the user. However, it relies on the data of web page searches based on human judgment to achieve that accuracy. In other words, machines can always be used to keep track of the value judgments made by human minds; but they cannot make the judgments themselves.
Another important function of the human mind is to process information and analyze situations emotionally. Machines can hardly develop such abilities. Take an example of the profession of teaching. Teachers need to connect with the students emotionally in order to understand the different characteristics of each student and teach them accordingly. Although it is true that modern AI agents can be used for teaching, these tools cannot interact at the emotional level.
Finally, human minds have the ultimate ability to create new ideas that machines cannot develop. Machines can have excellent performance on tasks that require regular patterns but not creativity. For example, researchers need to fathom a huge number of journals and research papers to find the gap and develop the research idea.
With the recent advent of rapidly advancing Artificial Intelligence tools, one can say that modern-day machines have the power to solve many complex tasks that no one could imagine just a decade ago. Take the example of ChatGPT, it has generated booming revenues for its capabilities to perform a variety of tasks at almost perfect accuracy. However, it can only be used for tasks that are repetitive and automated easily.
In conclusion, it is clear that in the foreseeable future, machines can never overtake human minds as individual identities. Needless to say, with the current pace of technological advancements, machines will achieve abilities to do more and more complex tasks. But they can only be used to make manual, repetitive tasks easier for humans.
- Dog Breeding 80
- Earthworms and its effects on soil plants and animals 78
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 76
- There are times when it is acceptable not to tell the truth 87
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...nce we can make a judgment based on our past experiences and learn from our mistakes. For instan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27804878049 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85522575268 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3945385383 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.047619048 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5238095238 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448546788391 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144168629327 0.076458572812 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.187073852088 0.0737576698707 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248135872196 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18239581752 0.0645574589148 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.